{"id":192979,"date":"2026-06-07T11:15:46","date_gmt":"2026-06-07T09:15:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.esteri.it\/sala_stampa\/archivionotizie\/\/2026\/06\/tajani-cosi-metteremo-piu-soldi-nelle-buste-paga-degli-italiani-libero\/"},"modified":"2026-06-08T11:22:42","modified_gmt":"2026-06-08T09:22:42","slug":"tajani-cosi-metteremo-piu-soldi-nelle-buste-paga-degli-italiani-libero","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.esteri.it\/en\/sala_stampa\/archivionotizie\/interviste\/2026\/06\/tajani-cosi-metteremo-piu-soldi-nelle-buste-paga-degli-italiani-libero\/","title":{"rendered":"Tajani: \u201cThis way we will put more money in Italians’ pay packets\u201d (Libero)"},"content":{"rendered":"

Minister Tajani, the feeling is that – once again – it will be the economy that decides the winner of the upcoming general election. Do you agree?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u2018Yes, I believe so too. Italians are rightly calling for greater prosperity, not a form of degrowth that can never be \u201chappy\u201d.\u2019<\/p>\n

We will go back to the polls in about a year\u2019s time. Before the election, many voters are expecting something tangible from this government. The middle class is still waiting for measures that will put more money in their pay packets. What measures do you deem necessary?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cFirstly, we will raise the threshold for the IRPEF tax reduction to \u20ac60,000, to the benefit of our middle class. We want to lower taxes on young people, thereby effectively increasing their take-home pay. We must also begin to exempt thirteenth-month bonuses from taxes, starting with the lowest wages.\u201d<\/p>\n

Forza Italia<\/em><\/strong> has always had a targeted strategy for small business owners. What about this time?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cWe have always valued those who take risks, set up companies and create jobs. Companies start small, and they later need the breathing space to grow and become economic players in markets, including global ones. This is the real driver of prosperity. Exports, which account for over 30 per cent of our GDP, continue to grow despite international crises and are approaching \u20ac650 billion. Next year we could reach 700 billion. But for companies to really take off, we need capital, a skilled workforce and, above all, a government that is not hostile, and bogged down in excessive bureaucracy and high taxes.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWealth is being distributed in an increasingly unequal manner; the State and the EU need to take action\u201d is the slogan not only of the left-wing parties, but also of commentators in the moderate media. Is this a problem for Forza Italia<\/em>? Could taking measures on wealth be a solution?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cWe are firmly opposed to a wealth tax. It would target assets on which tax has already been paid \u2013 a tax which, let us remember, is progressive and therefore increases as income rises. There are already 13 different types of wealth tax in Italy, ranging from road tax to taxes on current accounts and financial products. This is the reason why we also say \u2018no\u2019 to any suggestion of increasing inheritance tax, which we oppose on principle.\u201d.<\/p>\n

The tax burden on real estate and property assets could also increase through an update of cadastral registers. From time to time, there are calls to adjust the cadastral values. Would you accept such a move?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThe revision of the Cadastre needs not turn into another hidden wealth tax on Italians\u2019 homes. Rather, we must focus on providing homes for those who do not have one, especially young people who are finding it increasingly difficult to afford one. The government\u2019s Housing Plan is moving in this direction.\u201d<\/p>\n

There is still the problem of where to find the money to fund measures such as reducing fuel excise duties. You yourself have said that this is very costly.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cWe certainly cannot introduce new taxes. Every time I hear people say we need to introduce a wealth tax, to tax \u201cwindfall profits\u201d or revise the Cadastre, I feel like I am going mad because it is just another way of reaching even deeper into Italians\u2019 pockets. In 2025 Italy\u2019s public spending stood at over \u20ac1,150 billion, equivalent to 52% of GDP. A huge amount, which I believe could be sufficient if spent more wisely and made more efficient. This is everyone\u2019s responsibility, including Regions and Municipalities: we must not waste public money, which is, after all, the Italian people\u2019s money.\u2019<\/p>\n

Where can we be more efficient?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cI wish to recall what the President of Confindustria<\/em> suggested: by restructuring the more than 500 types of support we provide to companies, we could recoup around \u20ac20 billion. Should we recall Italy\u2019s vast, underutilised state-owned assets? We need to make good use of the \u20ac14 billion budget overrun agreed with the EU for energy \u2013 achieved thanks to our good teamwork \u2013 and the remaining funds from the NRRP and regional cohesion funds: this is a lot of money, but it is never mentioned.\u201d<\/p>\n

The League has once again suggested increasing the levy on bank profits. Could this be a solution?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cOur country needs many things, but it certainly does not need to scare investors with quasi-Soviet crusades against windfall profits. The tax measures relaunched in Italy by all left-wing parties have already proved to be a failure in every country that has introduced them. Or do we probably want to tell the market that the State can decide on a threshold beyond which a legally earned profit becomes an abuse? There are exceptional circumstances that may create the conditions for a voluntary contribution, but it needs to remain just that.\u201d<\/p>\n

So what will you do about banks?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cWe want to engage in dialogue with them to create the conditions and incentives to ensure that the over \u20ac1.75 trillion in savings \u201cparked\u201d in current accounts is invested in the economy. If every Italian, acting of their own free will, found it profitable to invest \u20ac10 for every \u20ac100 they hold in banks, we would have an additional \u20ac175 billion in investment \u2013 a new NRRP every year. I am thinking solely of the role that professional pension funds could play: investing in Italy to help Italy grow. This would be the real turning point for reviving the country\u2019s economy. Our savings are our oil.\u201d<\/p>\n

In practical terms?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cWe need tools to convince Italians to invest in credible and profitable projects. Public-private project financing can be a driver of growth that creates wealth to be used across many sectors, from healthcare to minimum pensions, from infrastructure and new housing to reducing payroll taxes. I am thinking in particular of taxes on new recruits, to prevent young people from leaving the country.\u201d<\/p>\n

That is the reason why Confindustria\u2019s Youth Group has asked you to cut income tax for workers under 35. What is Forza Italia<\/em>\u2019s response?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cThe response is that they are right and we need to work towards this goal. We will also commit to reducing the tax burden on capital investment in young businesses and during the first five years of a start-up\u2019s life. Our fight to reduce taxes aims to unlock potential and make the entire Italian economy grow.\u201d<\/p>\n

Could a controlled increase in public deficit be the way to put more money in workers\u2019 pockets?<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201cIt is true that taxes on labour are high, which is the reason why we have reduced the tax wedge. We can certainly use the deficit for support measures. But wages grow if the economy is strong and companies are healthy. Weak companies pay low wages; strong ones can pay high wages. Wages in exporting companies are generally higher than average. This is the reason why we also need adequate training and investment in new technologies. A fair wage is the result of pragmatic policies, not ideological shortcuts such as the minimum wage.\u201d<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Minister Tajani, the feeling is that – once again – it will be the economy that decides the winner of the upcoming general election. Do you agree? \u2018Yes, I believe so too. Italians are rightly calling for greater prosperity, not a form of degrowth that can never be \u201chappy\u201d.\u2019 We will go back to the […]","protected":false},"author":24,"featured_media":192880,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-192979","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-interviste"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.esteri.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192979","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.esteri.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.esteri.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.esteri.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/24"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.esteri.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=192979"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.esteri.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192979\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":192982,"href":"https:\/\/www.esteri.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/192979\/revisions\/192982"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.esteri.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/192880"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.esteri.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=192979"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.esteri.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=192979"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.esteri.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=192979"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}